Some of you may be familiar with Paul Tuttle's North West Foundation For A Course In Miracles http://www.nwffacim.org where Mr. Tuttle channels Rajpur (aka Jesus). Well here's something from Rajpur that makes good sense with regard to how one should relate to or handle the information that's revealed in a video such as The Esoteric Agenda http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/esoteric_agenda.php

**********

RAJPUR:   You need to understand that there is a difference between the promotion of fear for the sake of creating unrest, inner conflict, so as to block one from accessing his greater capacity to be aware, or to be open to the experience of his actual and ever present divinity, and the relating or sharing of the actual direction in which things are moving, and for which responsibility needs to be taken so that, indeed, the direction can be changed.

It is one thing to tell someone that they are about to put their hand on a hot stove. It is another thing to imply to someone that there is danger all around him and that therefore he had better be on guard and not allow himself to be at rest or peace.

Now, there are directions that individuals and groups are trying to implement. There are directions that are evolving as a result of ignorance and lack of responsibility in the world, and it is important for these things to be brought out. This is not meant for the purpose of creating fear, but of reducing ignorance so that something that would be fearful can be changed and not come to pass.

Now, there certainly are individuals and groups in the world who are attempting to take over the monetary system -- the economy, in the final analysis -- and if individuals are not aware that their very attitude and their mind-sets govern how much or how little of their fulfillment or abundance they will experience, they will not be alert to the fact that this so-called "take-over" has no bearing upon them whatsoever. Thinking that it does have complete bearing on them, they will, like the blind following the blind, subject themselves to controls which, in the final analysis, can have no effect on them whatsoever, but which will seem to have effect over them because they know no better and behave as though the controls have effect.

Now, what is being called for in the sharing of this information is greater self-responsibility. But, I will tell you this, first of all one's attention needs to be gotten! So, bold statements are made. At the same time that bold statements are being made, gentler information regarding the resolution of the apparent problem is also being provided, and will be surfacing -- and, indeed, already is surfacing.

Your work is already communicating the essential facts needed so that people can become aware that they are not subject to an economic system, or the economy, or groups of financiers. The groundwork is already being laid. But, for those who are not even aware that the groundwork is there, and who are dreamily moving forward in the same old ruts, there is a need for the news that forecasts the direction in which things are actually moving to be brought out, so that they can be shaken out of their ruts and then become aware of the steps they can take to demonstrate their independence from and invulnerability to the attempts of these groups and individuals.

This is an important point to understand, and it would be foolish to discount the "bad news" simply on the basis that it seems to do nothing but generate fear. What needs to be watched out for is the generation of fear that is not connected with any actual focus in the world -- that which simply undermines one's integrity, one's peace, one's confidence; that which increases one's doubt so that he does not dare to trust his very Being. And thus throws away his Integrity because there is this undercurrent of fear, and for no other reason at all.

You understand my point?

QUESTION: Yes. In the beginning part of your statement, the implication I felt was that the information was accurate. Later, however, it seems to me that what you were saying was that it's a set-up -- that it isn't really accurate, but it's being presented to get our attention and then to release the illusion of it all.

RAJPUR: No. That is not correct. There actually are those individuals and groups in the world who have this as their goal. This is not a story that is being made up to promote clarification. It is the effect of individuals coming from and validating their ego sense of existence -- the need for power and control based upon the belief that abundance is not inherent in existence, but must be created, accumulated, and used for purposes of power and control. This is the reason that there are individuals attempting what this volume suggests or chronicles.

So, there actually is, in the world, this process occurring. This is not a set-up. This is just the aggravating manifestation of the ego in one of its worst forms. It is going on. It needs to be seen for what it is, and individual Integrity needs to come to the fore in individual consciousness so as to discover its invulnerability to such idiocy.

QUESTION: So, you're saying that what is needed here is just the commitment to the Truth, individually, and let whatever else happens happen?

RAJPUR: No. In paying attention to one's own Integrity, one may find himself challenging publicly the direction in which things are going. One may not find himself just letting things be as they are. On the other hand, one may find that he is not going to be directly involved in publicly discrediting the approach and defusing it. So, you cannot make an assumption one way or another as to what the steps will be that will follow getting in touch with one's own Integrity.

The thing is that any step challenging the status quo, when it is coming from the experience of one's Integrity, will not be compulsive because there will be no fear associated with it. One will know exactly what to do and not to do that will contribute to the resolution of the mind-set, the frame of reference, that feels that the grasping for one's Good, as though it weren't inherently his already, is an invalid and "destructive" mind-set, because its practice constitutes the very thing that blinds one -- and blinds the world on a general basis -- to his inherent abundance that isn't dependent upon accumulation.

QUESTION: Are you saying that all we need to do is trust in the Integrity of our "collective being" that we are going to awaken to this mind-set


RAJPUR: No. That would be foolish at this point. You don't have a basis for trusting the "collective being," because you are not clearly experiencing your individual Being. So, that would be a blind faith that wouldn't involve the experiential element of Knowing of the divinity of your own Being that discloses the Integrity of all of mankind to you. It is in your clear perception of your individual Integrity as the very Presence of the Father that discloses to you at an experiential level that the same thing is true of your fellow man. That deep knowing is the only thing that will allow you to have trust in the essential divinity of every other one.

So, you start with yourself, and to the degree that you become aware of your own Integrity, you separate yourself from the mass ego thought -- the general attitude in the world -- and therefore the general attitude in the world is weakened. Each one who does this contributes to the weakening of the status quo, the ego frame of reference. And the more individuals there are who are in touch with their Integrity, who are experiencing their inviolable and secure divinity, the more there are who are able to join with those who are still embroiled in the ego's frame of reference at the level of their essential divinity and strengthen It, so that it will become easier for those still embroiled to shift within themselves to their clearer experience of their divinity.

But, you see, this is not a matter of having faith in your fellow man. It is a matter of Knowing within yourself, because you have experienced it, that there is reason to trust that in your fellow man which is absolutely divine and always present.

You see, right now everyone is trusting everyone else to this extent -- and especially at this current time: They are watching to see what everyone else is going to do, and what everyone else is doing. In this process they are giving their power away. And in the absence of their expression of their own power everything is going to pot, you could say, simply because no one is expressing individual Integrity -- staying at that centered place where one's actions are guided and governed by clarity that doesn't gather data from external sources in order to be present. This dynamic is really no different from any other personal financial dynamic.

QUESTION: The other day I did go out and buy some gold. Was that an appropriate thing to do?

RAJPUR: It certainly was not a mistake. But, do not now allow yourself to feel somewhat secure because you have some gold. It cannot provide your security any more than a healthy stock market or a healthy economy. But, it was not a foolish thing to do in any way.

QUESTION: Can you add a little more clarity regarding it not being a foolish thing to do? On the other side of the coin, was it an appropriate, smart, self-appreciating thing to do, congruent with what my Being is unfolding?

RAJPUR: Yes, it certainly was.

QUESTION: Would it be advisable for me to continue to buy gold as my abundance increases in the next few months?

RAJPUR: Yes, it would. But, again, let the decision to purchase it arise out of a simple fearless awareness that at the moment this purchase is appropriate. You see, the key is to always be willing to listen for the appropriateness or inappropriateness of a particular step or a particular decision. For example, it would not be wise for you to invest or utilize all of your spare cash to purchase gold with.

You cannot make general assumptions and then use those general assumptions as ongoing guidelines, because on an ongoing basis there needs to be listening to see whether, under the present circumstances, such and such a thing is actually appropriate.

Now, be alert for the tendency to attempt to protect yourself. I know this is difficult when that which creates the most fear in you seems to be active and aggressive. But the attempts to protect yourself will, in almost all instances, cause you to rely upon memory rather than actual "living guidance in the Now." It will cause you to become compulsive.

Understand that all attempts at protection are aggressive acts. You do not need to protect yourself in the presence of a benign environment. So, if you are practicing self-protection, then an assumption has been made that the environment is hostile, and that assumption is a separating "war-like" act. You have decided that your environment or the circumstances are your enemy, and thereby you start the "war," and you will appear to evoke from your experience substantiation of your attitude -- your war-like stance.

The reason you will seem to have that in your experience is because you are not listening for how to be appropriate in that environment because you are preoccupied with your biased perception of it. So, if you expect to see improvement, if you expect to experience your security, then you are going to have to withdraw your act of war, your decision to see your world or circumstance as an enemy. And then listen for how to be appropriately in that environment so that you do not stub your toe -- so that you do not bump into it unexpectedly and then decide that it is the world that has bumped into you.

When you choose to see your circumstance or environment as an enemy, you have had to stop paying attention to what it truly is. And that is like closing your eyes and then attempting, on the basis of your imagination of your world, to move through your world without bumping into things.

Now, I have said it before, and I will say it again: You exist right in the middle of Reality, right in the middle of the Kingdom of Heaven -- at this instant - with your eyes all squinched up, saying, "I cannot see the perfection." And all that is needed is for you to open your eyes up. That is the equivalent of releasing the aggressive act of denominating your world or your circumstance as an enemy, or as something disassociated from, separated from, the Father -- something existing on its own, outside the control and Presence of God.

Remember, your determination that the world is your enemy is an act of hostility which you are engaging in, and which you must release if you wish to experience more harmonious feedback from your world.

QUESTION: So, then, the perception that there are these people who have an interest in moving from ego and controlling the monetary system can be seen, can be noticed and still loved just the way they are?

RAJPUR: It can be seen and noticed and defused by virtue of seeing that it does not have any actual substance to it that can be affective to you, or to whomever is engaging in this process of inner clarity that defuses the apparent threat.

QUESTION: So, if I am at Peace with it, without denying it, and I can feel the Essence of the participants, their divinity, in spite of how they are outwardly acting, if I can feel that peace and love them truly, then that is the most that I can do?

RAJPUR: You are absolutely correct. You understand perfectly.

QUESTION: And I feel it now.

RAJPUR: Yes. You see, what you are looking for, what everyone is looking for, is that which is dependable. We could call that which is dependable "the Eternal Constant" -- that which is forever unchanging in its Nature and character and movement. That Eternal Constant is not "out-there" in the world. It is in the observer. In fact, the observer is the Eternal Constant.

QUESTION: I am very grateful for your support.

RAJPUR: You are welcome. Again, do not be afraid when apparent danger is pointed out to you. If you were driving in a car and you yawned, and in the process of yawning your eyes were not on the road, and there were a car ahead of you in the left-hand lane that was pulling in front of you and you did not see it, and the person sitting next to you said, "Watch out!" you would be very grateful that the call for alertness was made. You would not make anything out of it other than that a need for a change was called for in what you were doing.

It would be foolish for you to say, "Oh, my god, we're going to have a wreck," and just go ahead and have the wreck. That is not the point. Immobilization is not the point. No response is not the point. The point is to bring into the arena of discernment and awareness the fact that something is pending that needs correction so that correction can be made. That is the point.

Now, this is different from the ego's ploy to create anxiety, fear, doubt, distress, because it (the ego) provides no focal point. What needs to be changed, or what it suggests is going on, is never pinpointed. One never knows what actually needs to be dealt with. It is not a call for nothing more than fear, itself. So, fear itself -- the process of listening to the ego and reacting to it -- is what needs to be dealt with.